RR Phantom
Location : Wasted Space Job/hobbies : Cayman Islands Actuary
| Subject: Federal Grand Jury Petition Mon Mar 21, 2022 5:10 pm | |
| Background
The Data Didn't Lie... People Did.
We began reviewing the scientific literature and tracking daily data from Italy, South Korea, China and the U.S. on March 12th, 2020. By mid-April, it was very clear that the high-risk demographic would be people over 50 years of age and with multiple pre-existing (comorbid) conditions, but for everyone else COVID would be a highly recoverable infection as has proven to be the case particularly with immune priming and early treatment strategies.
On March 24, 2020, the CDC published the infamous COVID Alert No. 2 that significantly de-emphasized pre-existing conditions (comorbidities) by relegating them to section 2 of the death certificate dealing with contributing factors, while simultaneously incentivizing COVID diagnosis, even in presumed cases, and placing COVID in part 1 of the death certificate dealing with causes of death. Nevermind, that this is not how death certificates had been reported for the previous 17 years for all other causes of death.
Then, on April 15, 2020, the CDC adopted the April 5, 2020 position statement (Interim-20-ID-01) from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologist (CSTE) allowing for COVID to be diagnosed from a single cough and offering no methodology for ensuring the same person could not be counted multiple times. In essence, the CDC effectively outsourced the responsibility for developing clinical definitions for what constitutes a COVID case to a non-profit organization heavily funded by special interest dollars, but not before providing FOUR subject matter experts to the CSTE for the development of this attempted bypass of federal oversight. The CDC is filled with brilliant epidemiologists and doctors, why outsource these crucial decisions to a non-profit organization? Why adopt the position statement without public comment or federal oversight?
These changes in data definition, collection, and analysis were made only for COVID. The changes were implemented by the CDC by allegedly violating the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), and Information Quality Act (IQA). These 3 Federal Laws ensure that federal agencies follow compulsory process, open public comment for all proposed changes to data collection and analysis, and also notify the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) of any proposed changes. The OMB then provides independent oversight to ensure accuracy of data, transparency throughout the process, and ensure that the federal agency requesting the change is in full compliance with the law. So why didn’t any of this happen? Emergency situations do not render federal laws null and void.
.https://www.covidcon21.com/index.php/grand-jury-petition/ |
|