RR Phantom
Location : Wasted Space
Job/hobbies : Cayman Islands Actuary
 |  Subject: Terror, Supreme Court Justices, and the Existential Threat Ammoland Inc. Posted on December 11,  Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:33 pm | |
| The Supreme Court is the major bulwark against the destruction of the Second Amendment at the federal level. The independence of the Court is essential to protect the Second Amendment at the Court.
On The Russ Clark Show, a local radio show in Yuma Arizona, an investment guru guest, known only as “Edward”, made a prediction: The Supreme Court justices would not accept the Texas v. Pennsylvania lawsuit contesting the legality of the elections in four states.
The show is local, but is regularly listened to by members of Congress (over the Internet). Congressmen and members of the Trump campaign have been regular guests.
Edward's argument was: Supreme Court Justices would not rule to enforce the Constitution, because they fear their homes would be burned.
In plain language, he believed political terror had already supplanted the rule of law in the United States. Edward predicted two run-off elections in Georgia will result in two Democrats being elected.
His argument: the machine in Georgia was successful in electing candidate Biden. Why wouldn't they duplicate the process for the two Senators?
Edward is not mentally challenged. He has a brilliant mind. He is said, by my sources, to be managing assets in the billions. He has wisely kept a low profile. His judgment has been excellent. It is how he has made his wealth, starting from middle-class roots.
I disagree with his analysis.
If we are already in an era of political terror, where Supreme Court justices rule because they fear their houses being burned, his results do not follow. It is a non-sequitur.
If we are already in a regime of political terror, safety is not obtained by placating the terrorists, those who would burn down your house, because you disagree with them.
Placating terrorists has been shown, over and over, to be a bad strategy.
The terrorists have marked 5 or 6 members of the Supreme Court as enemies of the people.
Those justices are: Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Barrett, and, less likely, Chief Justice John Roberts.
The first five of those justices have been subject to death threats for following the Constitution. They have been characterized by the Left as being evil people, on national television, by national leaders on the Left.
The groups who made those threats are the same groups who would credibly threaten to burn the justices' houses. They are *not* going to be placated by candidate Biden taking power.
They will be emboldened.
The five justices named are not stupid. If they fear their houses being burned, they know the threat will not go away if they give the people making the threats more power.
https://www.ammoland.com/2020/12/terror-supreme-court-justices-and-the-existential-threat/#axzz6gdNer3xw
_________________
Anarcho Capitalists Retail , OZschwitz Downunder BoutiqueAnarcho-Capitalists,AnCaps Forum,Anti-State,Anti-Statist,Inalienable Rights Defenders,Non-Aggression Principle,Non-Initiation of Force Principle,Rothbardians,Anarchist,Capitalist,objectivism,Ayn Rand,Anarcho-Capitalism,Anarcho-Capitalist,politics,libertarianism,Ancap Forum,Anarchist Forum,Vulgar Libertarians,Hippies of The Right,Forum for Anarcho-Capitalist,Forum for Anarcho-Capitalists,Forum for AnCap,Forum for AnCaps,Libertarian,Anarcho-Objectivist,Freedom, Laissez Faire, Free Trade, Black Market, Randroid, Randroids, Rothbardian, AynArchist, Anarcho-Capitalist Forum, Anarchism, Anarchy, Free Market Anarchism, Free Market Anarchy, Market Anarchy
 |
|
