UN: The shameful U.S. gay rights vote

Subject: UN: The shameful U.S. gay rights vote Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:26 pm

As Becky wrote, the fact that Obama picked Rick Warren, America's most popular preacher, to speak at his innauguration shouldn't be all that surprising and probably doesn't say much about his stance on any issues. That said, the anger of gay rights groups at the pick means that Obama is now under more pressure to actually do something meaningful for gay rights as president. One place he could start would be reversing the United States' deplorable decision last week to vote against a historic UN resolution to decriminalize homosexuality.

The resolution was a non-binding declaration "to ensure that sexual orientation or gender identity may under no circumstances be the basis for criminal penalties, in particular executions, arrests or detention." The Bush administration opposed the measure on the grounds that it could overturn states' decisions on issues like gay marriage. One wonders if they need a refresher on what "non-binding" means.

Joining the United States in opposition were Russia, China, the Vatican, and the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The latter group claimed that the resolution would lead to the legalization of pedophilia and also tried last week to have sexual orientation removed from a list of unacceptable reasons for summary execution.

The resolution doesn't have the force of law anywhere, but as UN Dispatch's Mark Leon Goldberg writes, previous agreements on women's rights show that "in the long run these kinds of resolutions do help to foster the genesis of new legal norms and new human rights."

If Obama wants to do something to assure his gay and lesbian supporters that he doesn't plan to sell them out, this is an easy one.

http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/10617

UN: The shameful U.S. gay rights vote

UN: The shameful U.S. gay rights vote

Anarcho-Capitalist Categorical Imperatives

AnCaps On Rights, Individualism & Lifestyles