RR Phantom
Location : Wasted Space
Job/hobbies : Cayman Islands Actuary
 |  Subject: What you need to know about the US debt ceiling  Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:21 am | |
| The US Congress might have made a deal to avoid the fiscal cliff, but you don't actually think they're done with 11th-hour partisan battles that bring the country's finances to brink of ruin, do you?
Of course not. Sometime in the next six weeks, the US Treasury won't have enough money pay the government's bills. Prevented from borrowing more because of the self-imposed debt ceiling, it'll face two options: either Congress must agree to raise the debt ceiling, or something awful will happen.
Confused? Here's what you need to know.
What is the debt ceiling?
Advertisement
Before 1917, the US Congress literally had to approve each new debt issuance, deciding on the bond's maturity, its interest rate, and what the money was specifically to be used for.
This became too burdensome on the eve of World War I, when the US government needed to quickly spend a lot of money without stumbling over administrative rules. So, in 1917 Congress passed the Second Liberty Bond Act, which provided authority to issue new debt with relaxed restrictions on the maturity and redemption of bonds being issued.
Those restrictions were eased throughout the 1920s and 1930s until being removed in 1939, replaced by an aggregate debt limit. After that, Congress basically told the Treasury: "You can borrow this much money. Go figure out the best way to do it." When the limit was hit, Congress raised it. Thus began the modern debt ceiling.
What's happened since then?
Since 1939, Congress has raised the debt ceiling 83 times, or about every nine months. It's usually raised without any fanfare or protest. Raising it became an issue only in recent years, when political parties realised it could be used as a bargaining chip.
Logically, there's no reason for there to be any protest. The most important thing to understand about the debt ceiling is that it doesn't control how much money Congress spends. It controls the ability to pay for what Congress has already agreed to spend.
What's happening now?
The current debt limit, $US16.39 trillion, was hit last week. The Treasury can still pay the government's bills on time by juggling around payments - what it calls "extraordinary measures" - but only until the middle of February. After that, the government's previously agreed-upon spending will exceed tax revenue, and without the ability to borrow more, the Treasury won't have enough cash to pay its bills.
What happens then?
They've never not raised the debt ceiling, so there's no precedent for what might happen if Congress doesn't reach an agreement.
The Bipartisan Policy Centre estimates the US Treasury will receive $US277 billion in tax revenue between February 15 and March 15 and owe $US451 billion in spending commitments, much of which are tax refunds. So just in the first month, there's $US174 billion in bills that the Treasury would be unable to pay.
Legal scholars and government officials, including Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, dispute the idea that the Treasury can "prioritise payments" to pay the most important bills first and may instead be forced to pay obligations on a first-come, first-serve basis.
Mix them up any way you'd like. Someone or some program that most people would deem a "priority" isn't getting paid.
And that's important in the eyes of global financial markets. Even if bond interest is prioritised and paid on time, it's likely that investors would see any group not getting paid as a government default. Lending is about trust. If you see a defence contractor not getting paid for services it's already delivered, would you trust the US government's creditworthiness? You probably wouldn't. And neither would the bond market.
There's no telling what would happen to markets if the debt ceiling isn't raised, but the odds are high that it would be some form of panic, almost certainly sending the US (and likely world) economy back into a recession (which, ironically, would worsen the deficit). Ben Bernanke put it politely: Not raising the debt ceiling "would no doubt have a very adverse effect very quickly on the recovery. I'm quite certain of that."
If Congress doesn't raise the debt ceiling, is there a reasonable Plan B?
Two options have been proposed that would let the Treasury borrow more even if Congress doesn't raise the debt ceiling.
One is to invoke a clause in the 14th Amendment to the US constitution and challenge the legality of the debt ceiling. But as President Obama said last year, "My lawyers ... are not persuaded that [the 14th Amendment] is a winning argument." Press Secretary Jay Carney put it more bluntly: "This administration does not believe that the 14th Amendment gives the president the power to ignore the debt ceiling - period."
Another is the so-called "platinum coin" option, where the Treasury exploits a law that lets it mint special-edition platinum coins in any denomination. In theory, it could mint a trillion-dollar platinum coin and cash it in at the Federal Reserve, thus creating enough money to pay its bills without borrowing more. As long as the Fed sold enough bonds to soak up the new cash created, it wouldn't lead to extra inflation.
Is the platinum coin option ridiculous? Of course. But so is voluntarily defaulting on your debt.
If they don't raise the debt ceiling, is the US bankrupt?
No. The debt ceiling is a self-imposed limit, and this is a self-imposed crisis. Global markets are more than willing to keep lending the US government money at very low interest rates. Congress can end this nonsense as soon as it wants to.
Cue Ronald Reagan:
“The country now possesses the strongest credit in the world. The full consequence of a default - or even the serious prospect of default - by the United States are impossible to predict and awesome to contemplate. Denigration of the full faith and credit of the United States would have substantial effects on the domestic financial markets and on the value of the dollar in exchange markets. The nation can ill afford to allow such a result. The risks, the costs, the disruptions, and the incalculable damage lead me to but one conclusion: The Senate must pass the legislation before the Congress adjourns.”
Foolish takeaway
Australian investors know that while China's rise has made it an important trading partner, the US consumer sector still largely calls the global economic shots. A US recession would be bad news for the global economy, and we're far from immune, as American demand for Chinese (and other) manufactured imports would certainly waver or fall.
The best we can do is hope that US lawmakers aren't silly enough to plunge themselves into a crisis entirely of their own making, and to which they have the (unbelievably simple) solution. They wouldn't, right?
Attention: With the debt ceiling debate likely a sideshow, Foolish, dividend loving investors and BusinessDay readers alike can click here to request a Motley Fool free report entitled Secure Your Future with 3 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-us-debt-ceiling-20130115-2cqo7.html#ixzz2I2Buux6Y
_________________
Anarcho Capitalists Retail , OZschwitz Downunder BoutiqueAnarcho-Capitalists,AnCaps Forum,Anti-State,Anti-Statist,Inalienable Rights Defenders,Non-Aggression Principle,Non-Initiation of Force Principle,Rothbardians,Anarchist,Capitalist,objectivism,Ayn Rand,Anarcho-Capitalism,Anarcho-Capitalist,politics,libertarianism,Ancap Forum,Anarchist Forum,Vulgar Libertarians,Hippies of The Right,Forum for Anarcho-Capitalist,Forum for Anarcho-Capitalists,Forum for AnCap,Forum for AnCaps,Libertarian,Anarcho-Objectivist,Freedom, Laissez Faire, Free Trade, Black Market, Randroid, Randroids, Rothbardian, AynArchist, Anarcho-Capitalist Forum, Anarchism, Anarchy, Free Market Anarchism, Free Market Anarchy, Market Anarchy
 |
|
