Undue and unaccountable influence of 'fact-checkers' on medical science and freedom of speech

An analysis of PolitiFact and Gabrielle Settles on COVID-19

Undue and unaccountable influence of 'fact-checkers' on medical science and freedom of speech ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdashboard.aflds.dev%2Fuploads%2Fi_Stock_1035600822_7bd2f139ff

Undue and unaccountable influence of 'fact-checkers' on medical science and freedom of speech ?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdashboard.aflds.dev%2Fuploads%2Fi_Stock_1035600822_7bd2f139ff

Table of Contents

1. Summary

2. The case against the fact-checkers

3. The case against PolitiFact writer Gabrielle Settles

4. Analyses of articles by Gabrielle Settles

A. Settles on the Black community and the events of January 6, 2021

B. Settles' case against Nurse Nicole Sirotek and Remdesivir

C. Settles' case against Steve Kirsch, VAERS, and MedAlerts

D. Settles' case against Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay and vaccine-driven variants

6. PolitiFact's Truth-O-Meter scam

7. Conclusion

8. Email communication between Settles and Dr. Lindsay

1. Summary

In America's Frontline Doctors (AFLDS)’s stand for medical freedom, calling out assaults on that freedom, wherever they are found, is essential. This analysis demonstrates how fact-checking organizations and fact-checkers destroy medical freedom and freedom of speech by censoring individuals and the facts, ideas, opinions, and products they promote if they are contrary to the mainstream narrative. We show how they mislead and misinform the public and that this is a modus operandi, rather than a lack of judgment or mistake. America’s Frontline Nurse Nicole Sirotek, COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund founder Steve Kirsch, and AFLDS member Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay are three of many individuals who have been accused of spreading false information by "fact-checkers," including by PolitiFact and their staff writer Gabrielle Settles. By reviewing Settles' work we see a clear pattern of deception and explain how a critical reader can often discern this, even without specialized knowledge. Not only do we provide evidence that Sirotek, Kirsch, and Dr. Lindsay are correct in their assessments, but that Settles purposely presents misleading or biased evidence with which to defame and libel them. We also show that PolitiFact and Facebook, with which they partner, promote themselves to the public as objective, even when they are not, by their own admission.

We are at a critical juncture in history - if we don't stand up for our freedoms now, they will be quickly lost. This even includes the freedom to be wrong.

.https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/news/post/undue-and-unaccountable-influence-of-fact-checkers-on-medical-science-and-freedom-of-speech/

Expression

Undue and unaccountable influence of 'fact-checkers' on medical science and freedom of speech

Undue and unaccountable influence of 'fact-checkers' on medical science and freedom of speech

Anarcho-Capitalist Categorical Imperatives

AnCaps In Science, Technology & Environment