CovOps
 Location : Ether-Sphere
Job/hobbies : Irrationality Exterminator
Humor : Über Serious
 |  Subject: NYPD Sergeant Says 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent' Is Just The Price We Pay For A 'Free Society'  Sun May 12, 2013 5:16 am | |
| We've been dealing with the New York police department lately, thanks to the mayor and the police chief
using the recent Boston bombing as an excuse to increase surveillance
efforts and enact other policies to further encroach on New Yorkers'
civil liberties. Whenever something terrorist-related occurs, it seems
as though the NYPD's reps can't keep their opinions to themselves, even
as the department itself drifts further and further away from being a sterling example of How Things Should Be Done.
In a recent Christian Science Monitor article dealing with "teenagers, terrorism and social media" (focusing on the recent Cameron D'Ambrosio arrest for making "terrorist threats" via some improvised rap lyrics posted to Facebook), Sgt. Ed Mullins of the NYPD shows up to make some very disturbing statements about your rights and responsibilities as a (mere) citizen. It starts with the worst kind of "policy" and goes downhill fast.
Using a zero tolerance approach to track domestic
terrorists online is the only reasonable way to analyze online threats
these days, especially after the Boston Marathon bombing and news that
the suspects had subsequently planned to target Times Square in
Manhattan, Mullins says. The way law enforcement agencies approach
online activity that appears sinister is this: “If you’re not a terrorist, if you’re not a threat, prove it,” he says. "Zero tolerance" is never
"reasonable." It never has been and it never will be. In fact, it's the
polar opposite. Zero tolerance policies simply absolve the enforcers of
any responsibility for the outcome and grant them the privilege of
ignoring mitigating factors. It allows them to bypass applying any sort
of critical thinking skills (the "reason" part of "reasonable") and view
every infractions as nothing more than a binary IF THEN equation.
Mullins goes even further than this, though, asserting that the burden
of proof lies with the person charged, not the person bringing the
charges. This flips our judicial system on its head (along with the
judicial systems in many other countries) and, if applied the way
Mullins views it, puts accused citizens in the impossible position of
trying to prove a negative. This is just completely wrong, and it's a
dangerously stupid thing for someone in his position to believe, much less state out loud. (Mullins also heads the Sergeants Benevolent Association, the second-largest police union in New York City.)
Believe it or not, Mullins is not done talking. What he says next doubles up on the "dangerous" and "stupid."
“This is the price you pay to live in free society right now. It’s just the way it is,” Mullins adds. No. It isn't.
This is the price Mullins is charging to
live in the NYPD's severely stunted version of a "free" society. The
NYPD has been harassing young minorities at the rate of 500,000
impromptu stop-and-frisks per year for the better part of the
last decade. For the past 10 years, the NYPD has been regularly
trampling citizens' civil liberties simply because they attend a mosque. The NYPD and Mayor Bloomberg have worked ceaselessly to make New York the most-surveilled city in the U.S.
That's the price New Yorkers are paying. It has nothing to do with
living in a free society. The NYPD takes liberties away and high-ranking
cops like Mullins have the gall to suggest there's some sort of
equitable exchange occurring. Mullins doesn't seem to understand (or
just doesn't care) that if you take away freedom you no longer have a free society.
It has been said that eternal vigilance is the price of liberty,
but "eternal vigilance" isn't shorthand for oppressive surveillance and
zero tolerance policies that make freedom less "free." "Eternal
vigilance" isn't treating the Constitution like a relic too worn and
tattered to serve any purpose in these "dangerous" times. And being an
officer of the law isn't an excuse to shut your intellect off and allow
your brain stem and broad policies to "work" in concert in order to
treat loudmouth teens on Facebook like a guy with a trailer home full of
explosives.
This "vigilance" is supposed to be put to use by citizens
in order to prevent authorities like Mullins from encroaching on our
liberties. It's not solely limited to a united military effort against
foreign powers. There are plenty of people apparently willing to attack
our freedom from the comfort of the home front.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/17164522967/nypd-sergeant-says-guilty-until-proven-innocent-is-just-price-we-pay-free-society.shtml |
|
