AnCaps
ANARCHO-CAPITALISTS
Bitch-Slapping Statists For Fun & Profit Based On The Non-Aggression Principle
 
HomePortalGalleryRegisterLog in

 

 Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
CovOps

CovOps

Female Location : Ether-Sphere
Job/hobbies : Irrationality Exterminator
Humor : Über Serious

Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights Vide
PostSubject: Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights   Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights Icon_minitimeThu Aug 12, 2010 6:59 am

University of Michigan law professor and anti-pornography crusader Catharine MacKinnon has avoided debating Strossen, a New York University law professor who heads the American Civil Liberties Union. As this book shows, Strossen has a broad arsenal of vital arguments. Free speech has long been a strong weapon to fight misogyny, she notes, and she catalogues the fuzzy legal theories behind censorship. She ascribes feminist panic over sexual expression to a surge in "cultural feminism," which was a response to 1970s setbacks to more tangible feminist projects like the ERA.

The "MacDworkin" (MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin) proposed law to fight "subordinating" porn, Strossen argues, misreads evidence of its effects on men and ignores more influential media images like advertising as well as the complexity of female sexuality. In practice, as recent Canadian cases show ominously, such censorship laws have been used to seize lesbian, gay and feminist material. Strossen writes in professorial prose, with numerous quotes from better writers, and eschews the opportunity to explore murkier issues like the sexism inherent in much pornography. But she forcefully makes her point that scapegoating porn diverts activists from more important fights for women's rights.

============

I liked the carefully reasoned defense of pornography in this book. By the end of this book you will be able to stand up to the mcDworkinites and their ilk. You will also be just a bit tired of hearing the same argument repeated from every possible angle. The author points out that victim's like Linda Lovelace are rare and snuff films are mythology. However, you will have to go elsewhere to find a solid analysis of what pornography does to its practitioners

=========================

Most rape victims in the U.S. are not females (even with all ages combined), but are grown men, due to the jail and prison system in the U.S. Due to this U.S. system, almost three times the number of female rape victims in the U.S. are males. For those figures, see Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights by Nadine Strossen, Professor of Law at New York Law School and President of the ACLU (New York University Press, 2000)

(Thanks, Sir Nigel Edmond III)

=====================================

http://www.amazon.com/Defending-Pornography-Speech-Womens-Rights/dp/0814781497
Back to top Go down
 

Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Anarcho-Capitalist Categorical Imperatives :: Inside AnCaps, Philosophy, Libertarians & Ancapdemia's Ebony Basement-