AnCaps
ANARCHO-CAPITALISTS
Bitch-Slapping Statists For Fun & Profit Based On The Non-Aggression Principle
 
HomePortalGalleryRegisterLog in
 

 Libertarian law firm asks SCOTUS to consider Colorado eminent domain case

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
CovOps

CovOps

Female Location : Ether-Sphere
Job/hobbies : Irrationality Exterminator
Humor : Über Serious

Libertarian law firm asks SCOTUS to consider Colorado eminent domain case  Vide
PostSubject: Libertarian law firm asks SCOTUS to consider Colorado eminent domain case    Libertarian law firm asks SCOTUS to consider Colorado eminent domain case  Icon_minitimeThu Nov 07, 2019 8:59 pm

A libertarian public interest law firm is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to end what it says is an abusive eminent domain practice in Colorado. 
The Arlington, Virg.-based Institute for Justice filed a petition with the court Thursday asking it to review a Colorado Supreme Court ruling and decide if private companies can use eminent domain for their own benefit.

Libertarian law firm asks SCOTUS to consider Colorado eminent domain case  5dc4a219cbe81.image

The case involves developer Woodcrest Homes, which in 2006 purchased a plot of land to develop near Parker, Colo. The company’s development plans stalled, however, due to the 2008 housing market crisis.  
A competing developer, Century Communities, purchased the land surrounding Woodcrest’s land and created a “special municipal district” called the Carousel Farms Metropolitan District – which is allowed by Colorado law – which then voted to condemn the land and seize Woodcrest’s property through eminent domain. 
Woodcrest argued in court that the seizure violated the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment, but the Colorado Supreme Court in June ruled that it was legal because the land would be used for “various utilities and public rights of way.”
But the institute says Century’s actions amount to an “old-fashioned landgrab.”
“When it comes to property rights, Colorado’s law is more akin to the Wild West than a constitutional republic,”  Institute for Justice attorney Jeff Redfern said in a statement. “This is nothing other than an old-fashioned landgrab. Unlike most eminent domain laws, which require governments to engage in the taking, Colorado’s law cuts out the middleman and just lets private developers use eminent domain to hand land over to themselves.” 
IJ said in its petition that a decision in the case could have national implications and clarification would lead to more consistent use of the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause 
“This Court should take this opportunity to clarify the meaning of ‘public use,’ ensure a consistent application of the Takings Clause nationwide, and, in so doing, resolve a serious and important constitutional conflict for the bench and bar,” the petition said.

https://www.mdjonline.com/neighbor_newspapers/extra/news/libertarian-law-firm-asks-scotus-to-consider-colorado-eminent-domain/article_fed0a553-6d8b-5451-97b1-9002cd5309ee.html
_________________
Anarcho-Capitalist, AnCaps Forum, Ancapolis, The Dark Side, OZschwitz Contraband
“The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime.”-- Max Stirner
"Remember: Evil exists because good men don't kill the government officials committing it." -- Kurt Hofmann
Back to top Go down
 

Libertarian law firm asks SCOTUS to consider Colorado eminent domain case

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Anarcho-Capitalist Categorical Imperatives :: Via AnCaps: Law & Enforced Unnatural Order-