AnCaps
ANARCHO-CAPITALISTS
Bitch-Slapping Statists For Fun & Profit Based On The Non-Aggression Principle
 
HomePortalGalleryRegisterLog in

 

 Supposedly, The Beatles 'did not spark a musical revolution in America'

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
RR Phantom

RR Phantom

Location : Wasted Space
Job/hobbies : Cayman Islands Actuary

Supposedly, The Beatles 'did not spark a musical revolution in America' Vide
PostSubject: Supposedly, The Beatles 'did not spark a musical revolution in America'   Supposedly, The Beatles 'did not spark a musical revolution in America' Icon_minitimeFri May 08, 2015 3:34 am

When the Beatles burst on to the US music scene with I Want to Hold Your Hand in February 1964, they were credited with launching a British pop invasion across the Atlantic.

Supposedly, The Beatles 'did not spark a musical revolution in America' Article%20Lead%20-%20wide9958227631mh06himage.related.articleLeadwide.729x410.ggvxrf.png1430956740945.jpg-620x349

Within a few months they held all top five spots on the Billboard Hot 100 list – a feat that has never been repeated – and the American music press, which once derided Beatlemania, suddenly could not get enough of the Fab Four.

The Rolling Stones and the Kinks soon followed to provide an onslaught of British rock in the US.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/music/the-beatles-did-not-spark-a-musical-revolution-in-america-20150507-ggvxrf.html#ixzz3ZWw060Jr
Back to top Go down
 

Supposedly, The Beatles 'did not spark a musical revolution in America'

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: Anarcho-Capitalist Categorical Imperatives :: More Via AnCaps: Culture, Art & Media-